tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29059245.post439074635380039516..comments2024-03-25T02:33:41.590-05:00Comments on FemaleScienceProfessor: Fake Review Contest Entries #17-20Female Science Professorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15288567883197987690noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29059245.post-8860927787387375492014-01-08T01:46:34.675-06:002014-01-08T01:46:34.675-06:00@Alex I thought the same thing. Surely they are fr...@Alex I thought the same thing. Surely they are from reviewers that are simply sending in their reviews after the deadline. Be patient.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29059245.post-28705544511544308522014-01-06T20:11:14.243-06:002014-01-06T20:11:14.243-06:0021 sure hits close to home! I once had a paper rej...21 sure hits close to home! I once had a paper rejected from two journals despite excellent reviews from all but one reviewer (and revisions to address all comments), due to someone I'm positive reviewed both papers and whose work my paper contradicted. When I gave a talk on the results at the major annual meeting in my field, the session chair went on and on about how important the work was and how he was sure it would be published in the top journals. He was stunned when I informed him that I couldn't get it published.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29059245.post-27529341144366982462014-01-06T17:09:41.430-06:002014-01-06T17:09:41.430-06:00What happened to reviews 17 and 18? Did Reviewer ...What happened to reviews 17 and 18? Did Reviewer #3 put the kibbosh on publishing them?Alexnoreply@blogger.com